Votes for Werder vs Leverkusen game

Ole Werner (Coach of SV Werder Bremen): “Most of the time you aren’t 100 per cent glad with a draw. However, the standard of the opponent and the course of the game should be taken under consideration when evaluating the game. In the primary half, though we didn’t have as many clear possessions as within the second half, we twice had a bit extra effectiveness. Had an opportunity to play a traditional away game. Where you generally is a bit deeper than you supposed and nonetheless get your possibilities. In the second half, the equalizer got here from a protracted feeling. We had quite a lot of conditions in or across the penalty space the place we caught the ball. keep, however then not put it on aim very clearly. That’s why I’m fully glad with the efficiency and the purpose is okay for us. Not solely due to the way in which of the game and the standard of the opponent, but additionally as a result of we got here from the unsatisfactory Augsburg game. But that Not one thing you bang your head about within the night anymore.”

Marco Friedl: “It was an open game. I feel the underside line is passable and deserved. The backside line is that one group might have received, however after the course of the game you may’t say who precisely. In that respect we will stay with the purpose. I Leverkusen “Had a match or two towards me the place issues did not go so properly for me. You noticed as we speak which you can’t give your opponent an excessive amount of house and simply should be obnoxious. We tried to harm them and take away their vitality. Once they left Then, it is extraordinarily troublesome to defend. We all performed very properly within the 90 minutes.”

Milos Veljkovic (Werder goalscorer) On the aim and the enjoyment after it: “It was simply feelings as a result of it was such an in depth game and I used to be capable of assist the group. I used to be in the correct place on the proper time and switched rapidly and stayed there and did not run again. “

Won a degree or was there extra?

“Absolutely. I feel the game might have gone both manner. We might have gone 1-0 up as properly. Then they scored a improbable aim with the bulk, however we maintain at it. We’ve confirmed that every one season, many possibilities. Set up. And rating targets too.”

Marvin Duckash: “It was a really boring game. We set ourselves up rather a lot and we introduced quite a lot of that on the pitch. Of course we knew how briskly they had been coming at us and we felt that rather a lot within the first half, however how we defended issues was an enormous praise. We raised one risk or the opposite, that was additionally the plan and it labored very properly.

Ilia Grove: “In the top, the purpose is deserved. We had been behind, then made it 1-1. It was a very good Bundesliga game with possibilities for each side. We’re joyful to take the purpose with us. In Leverkusen, with a Champions League participant, it is an excessive amount of for a promoted group. Very good. The result’s fairly good.”

Romano Schmidt: “Well, first we play towards Leverkusen. Let’s not overlook, just a few days in the past they received towards Atlético Madrid, probably the greatest groups on the earth. Today was actually brutal. Although: I feel they’d their possibilities, particularly within the first half, but when we used our counter possibilities higher, possibly performed the final move higher, we might have completed higher. Overall, the draw is truthful and good for us.”

Kerem Demirbay: “Today we didn’t convert possibilities once more. We have been chasing him all season. Today we performed a very good game. We knew the opponent performed quite a lot of lengthy balls, had good headers after which went for the second ball and drove it down in a managed method. This is extraordinarily troublesome for us for the time being. Werder had been deeper within the second half after which labored with lengthy balls, which they play very well, largely going shotgun, which stretched them out properly. And that is how they break our game. It is just not simple to create possibilities towards such a deep opponent. We nonetheless had sufficient, you need to be trustworthy. And we’ve got to do it higher.

Gerardo Sion: “When we take a look at the desk and the variety of factors we’re clearly very dissatisfied, we should always undoubtedly be nervous. We envisioned it very in another way. There are all the time two analyses, one efficiency and the opposite level – and naturally we aren’t glad with that.”

Secure now: We’re providing you with 1 month of WK+ FREE!

Leave a Comment